2011 15" MacBook Pro i7 2.2GHz + SSD = Speed Demon

Its 2011 and its time for another Apple hardware refresh. To my surprise, I found that I hadn’t updated my personal workstation in over 4 years. Even though I had kept up with the latest stable of iOS devices over the years (more on the latest refresh later), I had relied on my stable MacBook since late 2007. Perched on my desk is a Black MacBook 3,1 with:

  • 2.2 GHz Core 2 Duo
  • 4 GB DDR2 RAM
  • 256GB HDD
  • 13.3″ LED Backlit Screen

MacBook Black

As a regular multi-tasking power user, it has handled my workload quite well. Generally, the kind of tasks I use this machine most often for are:

  • Browsing + iTunes + Reading PDFs + Downloading Media
  • TextMate + Browsing + iTunes
  • Post-Process RAW Files in Aperture & Photoshop + iTunes
  • Photoshop + Browsing + iTunes
  • Local Media Server + Off-Site Backup Server

I don’t see it becoming harder to continue to do these tasks, but it is sluggish managing these and powering a 23″ external LCD at the same time. I usually don’t venture into transcoding big files or any sort of gaming, however with iOS leading the way to OS X Lion, I believe its time for a change.
As any self-respecting geek, I would be remiss without ample research on which way to go. The Apple lineup has changed over the years and its become increasingly hard to decide between

  • Late 2010 MacBook Air – $1,299 – $1,799
  • Early 2011 MacBook Pro 13″ – $1,199 – $2,899
  • Early 2011 MacBook Pro 15″ – $1,799 – $3,899

My trusty iPad handles about 80% of my weekly workload, if need be, yet it just isn’t there when it comes to writing code for prolonged periods of time (not doing as much of this as I would want), editing PSDs or multi-tasking during video conferences. So I had to limit my test factors down to:

  • Mobility
  • Power
  • Speed
  • Future ready

As much as I wanted to justify getting a MacBook Air, I couldn’t find any justification for one over an iPad. Its just not powerful enough to handle a growing workload, as the experts detail over at

Conclusion – I don’t see the MacBook Air as a viable primary machine for a photographer or other graphics professional, but it will surely please any road warrior looking for more than an iPhone or iPad, but not a full-size laptop. For those purposes, I can highly recommend it, as it’s fun to use, and fits just about anywhere.

If you are working with RAW files extensively, then you are going to suffer through this over-glorified iPad. Its a beautiful machine all said and done, but just not for me.
So I was down to two – MacBook Pro 13″ vs MacBook Pro 15″. Being used to a 13″ screen, I really wanted to not add any bulk to my already gadget-heavy trips. However, once you break it down, Apple has made some curious choices with this machine:

  • Only Dual-Core i7 CPUs
  • Only Integrated Intel HD-3000 Graphic Chips (No AMD Radeon Option)
  • No Anti-Glare Hi-Res Widescreen Display Option

Even though, besides these three almost every other bit is just the same as its bigger siblings, it just feels crippled. Here’s a list of key differences between the two options from

The screen size doesn’t seem like much, but the difference between 1440×900 & 1680×1050 is gargantuan. Add to that the Glossy vs. Matte coating and the only real choice left was the 15″. Here’s what I am talking about, thanks to Wei Yang:

Normally, I would just upgrade the CPU & RAM to the max allowed and rest easy for the next 2-3 years. However, there has been a lot of talk about SSDs coming of age by experts like AnandTech – The SSD Anthology, it required a review. A 500GB 7200RPM seemed fast enough, but these graphs from made it seem pre-historic:

C300 SSD = Crucial RealSSD C300 6Gb/s 256G SSD
OWC SSD = OWC Mercury Extreme Pro 240G SSD
Apple SSD = Apple factory installed 256G SSD (Toshiba?)
WD 500G 7K = Western Digital Scorpio Black 500G 7200rpm HDD (WD5000BEKT)
Sea 500G 7K = Seagate Momentus XT Hybrid 500G 7200rpm HDD
Tosh 750G 5K = Toshiba MK7559GSXF 750G 5400rpm HDD (Apple factory option)
Hit 500G 5K = Hitachi Travelstar 5K500.B 500G 5400rpm HDD (Apple factory option)
Hit 320G 5K = Hitachi Travelstar 5K500.B 320G 5400rpm HDD (Apple factory option)

If you are having a hard time visualizing what that translates to, check this video out by iboorgut:

And this one by Alen09:

20-24 seconds flat to get to your Desktop! My now seemingly archaic 2007 MacBook takes about 2-3 minutes to get me to an usable Desktop. Here’s how Geekbench sees my MacBook vs the new MacBook Pro 15″ i7 2.2GHz:


Overall, there’s a minimum of 4x jump in performance & why not – here’s a list of the major improvements:

  • Battery = 2 hours -> 7-9 hours
  • WiFi = 2×2 MIMO -> 3×3 MIMO (source – AnandTech)
  • New Ports = Thunderbolt & SDXC
  • RAM = 4 GB 667 MHz DDR2 -> 8 GB 1333 MHz DDR3
  • CPU = 2.2 GHz Core 2 Duo -> 2.2 GHz i7 Quad-Core
  • Storage = 256 GB 5,400 RPM HDD -> 128 GB Apple SSD

With Apple supporting TRIM for Apple branded SSDs in Snow Leopard OS X 10.6.6 itself & more support coming up in OS X Lion, SSD was a no-brainer.

In layman terms, TRIM keeps your SSD optimized for unused memory blocks and keeps future WRITE operations speedy enough. Yes, I would like to get the OCZ Vertex 3 Pro when it comes out, but only if OS X Lion supports TRIM for 3rd party SSDs. With at least one SATA 6 Gb/s interface, the new MacBook Pros are certainly ready on the hardware front for these best-of-breed drives.
What has me particularly excited are these stats posted on AnandTech’s super-detailed review of the 2011 MacBook Pros:

Photoshop performance is just amazing on the new systems. The high end 15-inch MacBook Pro is actually faster than last year’s 8-core Mac Pro. Of course this is because Photoshop doesn’t scale perfectly with core count but it just shows you just how powerful these new quad-core CPUs are. If you do a lot of Photoshop work, the Sandy Bridge upgrade will be worth it.
Aperture performance is similarly class leading. Here the 2010 Mac Pro actually outperforms the high end 15 by around 6% but the fact that we can even mention the two in the same sentence is huge.

My final choice was whether to upgrade the CPU to 2.3 GHz or not & nailed it down pat:

The 5% faster 2.2 => 2.3GHz CPU option is not worth the $250 upcharge, since 5% is barely noticeable. But because this site’s testing requirements always require the top-end, I opted for the trivially faster CPU. My advice to most users is to put the savings into a larger or faster solid state drive…

Technically the 2.3 GHz option is an Intel 2820QM with a 8MB Shared L3 Cache, vs 6MB in the 2.2 GHz option or the Intel 2720QM; additionally, the 2.3 GHz will turbo to 3.4 GHz instead of 3.3 GHz (2.2 GHz). In daily use, users have only reported a 1.5% increase in CPU performance, which doesn’t justify the cost for now.
There you have it. My final spec ended up looking like this:

  • 2011 MacBook Pro 15″
  • 2.2 GHz Quad-Core i7 Sandy Bridge
  • 8GB 1333 MHz RAM DDR3
  • 128 GB Apple SSD
  • 15-inch Hi-Res Antiglare Widescreen Display
  • 750 GB 7200RPM OWC On-The-Go Pro FireWire 800/400 + USB 2.0 External Drive

The last bit was a tough one – Storage. I could open up my new machine and install a second hard drive in the Optibay or get a fast-enough external drive. I opted for the latter for now, but if Lion supports 3rd party SSDs I might get a bigger one internally and move things around. Thunderbolt would have been another option instead of just FireWire 800, but there aren’t any devices to buy as of now, once they crop up I am sure they will be worth a look.
Having ordered this beast, I am writing mini reviews like this one to bide time. I plan on posting a detailed review once I get my hands on this Speed Demon.

26 replies on “2011 15" MacBook Pro i7 2.2GHz + SSD = Speed Demon”

Which MacBook (Air or Pro) is better for programming with Objective-C, MonoTouch or Ruby?…
I think that you are going to regret getting the Air after a while. If you really need to code on the go and absolutely must have a long-ass battery life, you need to check out iPad + apps like Textastic. Alex (Textastic’s developer) is committed to m…

Is the 2.3Ghz Macbook Pro much better than the 2.2Ghz one?…
Technically the 2.3 GHz option is an Intel 2820QM with a 8MB Shared L3 Cache, vs 6MB in the 2.2 GHz option or the Intel 2720QM; additionally, the 2.3 GHz will turbo to 3.4 GHz instead of 3.3 GHz (2.2 GHz). In daily use, users (on various forums) have o…

Which is better for a programmer/gamer: a Macbook Pro or an iMac? Why?…
The new Sandy Bridge 2011 MacBook Pro 15″ are unbelievably fast. They are even comparable to the 2010 Mac Pros. Even a few months ago, it would be insane to mention the two in the same sentence, but if you check out the benchmarks all over the web, yo…

Thank you! Please share if you found it useful 🙂
That wallpaper is from Wei Yang (Flickr link included, will ask him personally too).

HI, I also ordered
2011 MacBook Pro 15″
2.2 GHz Quad-Core i7 Sandy Bridge
4GB 1333 MHz RAM DDR3 (upgrade to 8GB from 3th party)
128 GB Apple SSD
15-inch Hi-Res Antiglare Widescreen Display
I am panic with the storage too…do I install a second hd in the Optibay or get a external drive. Well, I found that you made the choice for the external one. Why ? Can you tell me actually there is any difference between with internal or external ?(In terms of speed? usability? or what else) I have no idea anyway…..waiting your reply.. thx ~

Thank you for dropping by.
There are a bunch of tradeoffs when you replace the Optibay, like
1. Warranty – You are voiding Apple warranty, whatever that is worth.
2. Battery Life – Some claim battery life doesn’t go down much, some say by 1 hour and some say by more.
3. Weight – People say there is no change in this mostly.
For me, those reasons are compelling enough to not mess around with the internals. Plus, I actually end up using the CD & DVD burner for family and friends.
However, the big reason that I didn’t do anything about it today is that I only wanted to buy a much higher capacity SSD with SATA III (6GB/s) support like the Vertex 3 Pro or the new Intel one. But OS X doesn’t support TRIM for 3rd party SSDs just yet. So I just decided to not mess around with it, get an amazing upgrade to my current machine and get an external drive.
In that, I was forced to only get the FireWire 800 enclosure from OWC with a 7200RPM drive inside, the fastest combination available today. If Thunderbolt had been tacked onto any storage device, I would certainly have gotten that. Mobility is a key requirement for me, so this works out best.
Hope this helps.

That’s going to be fast when it comes out. But I think I will go for something at least 500GB or more.
Thanks for the link.

 That looks pretty good. I am waiting on a couple of thunderbolt accessories – Storage & DVI Splitter.

I found this info by searching the build of my MBP, exact same but I now have 16gb of ram too, 3rd party. Curious about your SSD decision or search.. I am simply thinking of getting the OWC Electra 3G 240gb drive for my optical bay, with their kit for the bay & enclosure with cable for SuperDrive . …and leaving it at that. Done… No 6g incompatibility, less fuss, etc.
But you made a good point.. What about the TRIM option which did come enabled with my MBP. Can we use it in the optical bay?

Great review. I see that OWC has new 6GB/s drives out now–do you know how those compare to the Vertex 3 Pros? Also, any thunderbolt externally-bootable news yet–according to this they aren’t bootable: Finally, everytime I walk into an Apple Store I ask them when they will have an 8 GB configuration for their 2011 MB Airs–once they have that I was thinking of the MBAir, but your review may make me reconsider. Thanks!

Definitely worth it! I use it 12-13 hours/day and almost everyday I realize how much of a speed demon this machine is.

haha! You helped justify the (very expensive) purchase I just made… Same spec, but 256GB SSD. Seriously, these are pretty damned awesome machines! Thanks again…

Hi, your review was very interesting
I’m waiting for my 2011 MacBook Pro 15″2.2 GHz Quad-Core i7 Sandy Bridge4GB 1333 MHz RAM DDR3 (upgrade to 8GB from 3th party)128 GB Apple SSD15-inch Hi-Res Glossy Widescreen Display
to be delivered later this week 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *